What Central Bankers Have Forgotten: Voters Like Prosperous Free Markets

A Benjamin Cole post

As a lot, central bankers are not entrepreneurs or real estate developers, and are very risk-averse, and are minutely concerned with the strict control of prices (as measured) as opposed to robust prosperity.

And maybe not even: Most central bank staffers are in sinecures, paid on a seniority basis, and will get nominal pay raises on a schedule. For central bankers, prosperity equals deflation, even better if coupled with recession.

In short, central bankers are divorced from the economies over which they have such influence.

Voters Not Divorced

But most voters live and breathe in the real economy. They know when job markets are tight or loose, when there are boom times, or when the economy is dead.

It is indisputable that in economic downtimes, voters do not embrace free enterprise. In the Great Depression, the U.S. federal government ballooned, with voter encouragement. The last Great Recession in the U.S. helped usher in Obamacare.

If policymakers and central bankers want voters to hail capitalism and free enterprise, they need to create boom times in Fat City.  Shoot for tight labor markets, and lots of sniveling and whimpering about labor shortages. Then voters will love free enterprise.

And what would the United States look like if there were chronic labor shortages? How would lefties justify more and more welfare?

Gee, would that be such a bad outcome?

I mean, for anybody but central bankers?

3 thoughts on “What Central Bankers Have Forgotten: Voters Like Prosperous Free Markets

    • Mr. Velez: thank you so much for your comments. Yes I believe in free enterprise, especially when coupled with prosperity!

  1. A local radio host who self-identifies as conservative was complaining about the free lunch program in the schools yesterday, saying that we have a food stamp program to feed the indigent and we end up paying twice… as if we’d have hungry kids sitting there with nothing to eat while all of the other kids are served. I wonder if they will ever understand they are addressing the wrong problem, with it being much better to render those programs irrelevant than it is to just stop feeding jobless families.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.