Bernanke cried ‘wolf’ too many times

Six months ago I ended a post writing:

Mysteriously, while the “solution” has been staring in everybody´s face, few have taken the step to propose it. Bear with me. If all the nasty things that are evident – the high unemployment rate, the low employment-population ratio, the low labor force participation, among several activity LEVEL indicators – can be traced to the “unusual” drop in nominal spending (NGDP) that occurred after mid-2008, why not set a nominal spending level target?

After all, that´s surely under the control of the Fed. But no, the Fed keeps indicating that things will remain “awful” for an extended period of time, and that´s why rates will be kept low going into 2014 or even 2015!

And if “awful” is what you are content with, “awful” will turn into a permanent feature of the US economy. In other words, “jobs, farewell”!

Today two posts attracted my attention. One from Scott Sumner titled: How’s QE3 doing so far? Wrong question!

The question is; “how did it do?”  Past tense.  Here’s CNBC:

The Federal Reserve’s latest easing program may be nicknamed “QE Infinity” on Wall Street, but it’s having a very limited effect on the markets and economy so far.

Stocks have been flat to slightly lower since the central bank announced the third round of its quantitative easing program — QE3 — while economists remain pessimistic that it will achieve its stated goal of bringing down the unemployment rate.

That´s the pessimistic one. From Ryan Avent at Free Exchange, writing after the release of the minutes from the FOMC´s September 13 meeting, things look a bit brighter:

Now consider the September language (RA´s bolds):

To support continued progress toward maximum employment and price stability, the Committee expects that a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy will remain appropriate for a considerable time after the economic recovery strengthens. In particular, the Committee also decided today to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and currently anticipates that exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate are likely to be warranted at least through mid-2015.

Gone is the explanation that weak resource utilisation and low inflation will necessitate low rates. Instead, we learn quite clearly that rates will remain low even after good times have returned. That seems like a very important shift.

But perhaps this is reading too much into the Fed’s spare language. Minutes from the last meeting, released today, suggest otherwise:

With regard to the forward guidance, the Committee agreed on an extension through mid-2015, in conjunction with language in the statement indicating that it expects that a highly accommodative stance of policy will remain appropriate for a considerable time after the economic recovery strengthens. That new language was meant to clarify that the maintenance of a very low federal funds rate over that period did not reflect an expectation that the economy would remain weak, but rather reflected the Committee’s intention to support a stronger economic recovery.

There you have it. The Fed is clearly explaining that rates will remain low even after economic conditions would justify an increase. That implies that future inflation will be above the Fed’s target, and inflation expectations are responding.  Mr Bernanke’s name probably won’t make the evening news tonight. Yet the Fed effectively loosened monetary policy today, in a manner that should raise the return, in growth and hiring, of its ongoing asset-purchase plans.

The only difference between the post-meeting statement and the minutes is the explanation for the meaning of the new language.

They certainly took a long time figuring out what I, who am not a central banker, figured out the first time they said it. Maybe it´s “too late and too little” and who´s going to believe that Bernanke, the quintessential inflation targeter who implied that guys like Krugman and Blanchard who 3 years ago suggested a temporarily higher inflation target were “out of their minds”, is going to allow that to happen. An indication is given by Kocherlakota´s “recent conversion” to “dove land” saying that inflation would be allowed to reach 2.25%!

Ryan said the “Fed effectively loosened monetary policy today…”. I think Scott´s “pessimism” is more apt. Here are the markets reactions for the past month. Today´s gains ‘don´t set a standard’.

4 thoughts on “Bernanke cried ‘wolf’ too many times

  1. He said something about not being fooled into thinking that money was loose because of low interest rates in the Q&A after the last speech he gave. It’s quite a development from the old Bernanke who thought policy was accommodative a year ago. I also applaud his efforts to make clear that extending the rate guidance doesn’t mean they intend for the economy to be weak. He’s trying, at least, and it’s better than no improvement at all – maybe.

    • DJ, Bernanke has the requisite knowledge, has always known about interest rates not being indicative of MP stance, etc. Why did it take so long for him to come out and say it?
      Agree, better than no improvement at all.

      • I can’t imagine why it took him so long to talk about interest rates not being a reliable indicator considering that it’s in one of his papers from the early 2000s. I can’t imagine him even allowing the crisis to happen given his prior scholarship. Sumner thinks he was out voted. But there is still a problem of him being part of the institution rather than serving the public interest. I criticized him harshly when he was wrong as best as a layperson can do, carrying it very far and called for his resignation. But he didn’t resign. He’s still “The Man”, and the mess is still there because he was a weak leader. He’s moving the right direction and trying to pull his colleagues with him now, and all I can do until the end of next year is hope he can get the job done.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.