“August 15, 1971”

Quite a few (here, here, here) are “mourning” the 40 years of “fiat money”:

Forty years ago today, on the morning of Sunday, August 15, 1971, the US president, Richard Nixon, declared the inconvertibility of the dollar into gold.

As a result, the Bretton Woods system officially ended, and the dollar became a fully fiat currency, backed not by gold but by the promise of the government.

With the burial of the last vestiges of the gold — that “barbarous relic” of the past, in Keynes’s words — the annoying limitation on the creation of money and credit was broken. Human needs, as well as political demands mobilized through democratic majorities (and minorities), are infinite.

Why stop spending? Why sacrifice immediate pleasures? The new fiat currency, devoid of intrinsic properties, releases governments from their commitment to convertibility, granting unlimited powers to the rulers of this statist system. With the burial of sound money, Keynes stands as the prophet of a new era of enjoyment and excitement under the new gospel of spending. Fiat money helps to remove the link between production and consumption, contributing to the delusion that the ineradicable scarcity of capital has been abolished.

But it was always backed by the promise of government…And it was the government reneging on this promise, much earlier, that brought things to a head in the early 1970´s.

Things went from bad to worse, not because the gold underpinning of the dollar was severed, but because from the mid 1960´s the government had embarked in inflationary monetary policies.

In the first half of the 1960´s, real growth was strong and inflation low and stable. As soon as it became clear that the nominal spending growth trend was incompatible with low inflation, inflation began to rise. The figures show this very clearly.

Just as it wasn´t the “break from gold” that caused inflation, it was not the oil supply shocks of the 1970´s that “perpetuated” inflation. Both were the consequence of the “monetary disorder” that began in the 1960´s! Incredibly, to some central bankers (Burns, for instance) “inflation was a non monetary phenomenon”!

The figure for NGDP growth clearly shows the “Volker transition” from high to low inflation which gave rise to the “Great Moderation”. Unwittingly, Greenspan´s “appropriate monetary policy” concept in practice did a good job of “targeting nominal spending growth along a stable level path”.

This was achieved because Greenspan, in contrast with Bernanke, never “targeted inflation”, even implicitly. And the big loss in stability (“Great Recession”/”Little Depression”) happened soon after a die-hard inflation targeter (Bernanke) came to power and became “obsessed” with oil and commodity shocks!

7 thoughts on ““August 15, 1971”

  1. Really excellent commentary. I don’t know how you keep coming up with gem after gem. I hope the psychic income I derive from reading your posts can at least equal the monetary losses I am enduring due to the slow economy.

  2. Benjamin Thanks. Very flattering. My “production process” follows the script: Read, see if it makes theoretical sense and then try to describe it in pictures. It´s in the pictures where usually I find the “inconsistencies”.

  3. interesting rate on bernanke as an inflation target … i never thought of him as a hawk but i guess when you average out inflation prints over a few quarters there is certainly a certain degree of effectiveness in targeting inflation despite some “outlier” prints.

    it does feel a shame that most of the discourse is centered around creating monetary inflation (unit of measure) rather than demand based inflation (perhaps with labor utilization as a quick first proxy). and that i feel, prevents the necessary supply side reforms from being targeted or happening.

  4. Read this. Mercy–btw, how open is Brazil to immigration?

    Perry Says Fed Spending Before Election Almost ’Treasonous’
    August 16, 2011, 10:49 AM EDT
    MORE FROM BUSINESSWEEK

    By John McCormick

    Aug. 16 (Bloomberg) — Texas Governor Rick Perry, finishing his first full day of campaigning for the U.S. Republican presidential nomination in Iowa, said it would be “almost treacherous — or treasonous” for Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke to increase stimulus spending before the 2012 election.

    “If this guy prints more money between now and the election, I don’t know what you would do with him,” Perry said at a backyard appearance in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. “We would treat him pretty ugly down in Texas. Printing more money to play politics at this particular time in American history is almost treacherous — or treasonous in my opinion.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.